Search for: "COOPER v. HOLDER" Results 521 - 540 of 564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Obama Administration asked for ‘balance’ in intellectual property appointments (Public Knowledge) (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (EFF) (Law360) (Intellectual Property Watch) Senate Judiciary Committee passes Patent Reform Act of 2009 to Senate floor (Promote the Progress) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (Patent Baristas) (Patent… [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
Or catfood, for that matter ...Microsoft and dogfood: an American idiom demystified for non-US readers hereMore dogfood here and hereDog eat dog here and hereCat eat dog hereTypo about cooperation between Widows and Linux here [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 3:52 pm
     Cooperative Corporations Act      15 8. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
Marilyn Barrett, California Tax Attorney at Jeffer Mangels, Discusses Select Tax Provisions of President Obama's Economic Stimulus Package Effective February 17, 2009, President Barack Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (otherwise known as the "Stimulus Bill"), $787 billion economic stimulus legislation which President Obama said marks a "major milestone on our road to recovery. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
[Federal Register: December 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 245)][Rules and Regulations] [Page 77473-77491]From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov][DOCID:fr19de08-1] --------------------------------------- Rules and Regulations Federal Register --------------------------------------- This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations,… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
Santa Fe Elevator Corp. 331 U.S. 218 (1947), and more recent cases still fighting with that question, Staple Cotton Cooperative Assoc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 11:59 am
California Court of Appeal: Coerced Disclosure Doesn't Waive Privilege From Keith Bishop: Here is a significant decision - UC Regents v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]