Search for: "COSTA v. COSTA" Results 521 - 540 of 1,410
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2016, 6:08 am by Nassiri Law
Miller’s Trucking – Oral Wage Agreement Weighed, March 15, 2015, Costa Mesa Overtime Lawyer Blog [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 2:58 am
Like the law on passing off, it is a legal construction of UK courts which Danckwerts J first acknowledged in 1960 in Bollinger SA v Costa Brava Wine [this resulted from an action aimed at preventing the defendants from calling their product 'Spanish champagne'], and has more recently excited the minds and hearts (and possibly also the hunger) of passing off enthusiasts with, for instance, the Greek Yoghurt case [here, here and… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 8:12 am by Nassiri Law
Miller’s Trucking – Oral Wage Agreement Weighed, March 15, 2015, Costa Mesa Overtime Lawyer Blog [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
(How they succeeded in pulling off that strategy will be the subject of my following post.)For ECUSA and its attorneys, the world of church property law began and ended with Watson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 8:19 am by Nassiri Law
Miller’s Trucking – Oral Wage Agreement Weighed, March 15, 2015, Costa Mesa Overtime Lawyer Blog   [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 8:35 am by Nassiri Law
Miller’s Trucking – Oral Wage Agreement Weighed, March 15, 2015, Costa Mesa Overtime Lawyer Blog [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 3:33 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Los demandantes expusieron que fueron víctimas de prácticas criminales, predatorias, fraudulentas y un quiebre a su deber de fiducia por parte de los abogados, por lo que deben ser restituidos por los daños, más costas y honorarios de abogados. [read post]