Search for: "COURT CASE" Results 521 - 540 of 608,384
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
  In a recent case, Division Three also reviewed a case in which the juvenile court had not addressed the issue of racial bias or discrimination. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 1:18 pm by John Floyd
In these cases, the court is saying that “but for” the official misconduct or the flawed evidence used to convict, there is a reasonable probability that the jury would have reached a different verdict. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 12:49 pm by John Floyd
  Ronald Mann, in Scotusblog, sums up the grammatical confusion nicely, “The dispute in the case turns on the meaning of the “and” between subparagraphs B and C. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 12:19 pm by mdkeenan
  An attorney can review your case for your best possible defense. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 11:56 am by Arfaa Law Group
The Right to Pursue Federal Claims in Medical Malpractice Cases The court reviewed the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), focusing on whether subject matter jurisdiction was established. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 10:11 am by Howard Bashman
“A String of Supreme Court Decisions Hits Hard at Environmental Rules; Four cases backed by conservative activists in recent years have combined to diminish the power of the Environmental Protection Agency”: Coral Davenport of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 9:51 am by Stephen Bilkis
Div. 2021), the Supreme Court, Bronx County, considered a medical malpractice claim involving allegations that the plaintiff suffered serious brain injuries following treatment for an asthma attack. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 9:48 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
A recent Florida appellate court decision has highlighted the difficulties of many Florida auto accident cases. [read post]
The post Malawi court dismisses case to legalize same-sex relationships appeared first on JURIST - News. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 7:52 am by Tom Smith
WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court ruled Friday that the Justice Department improperly charged some of the people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, a decision that could affect hundreds of cases—and potentially help former President Donald Trump.Prosecutors have charged more than 1,400 Trump supporters who attacked the building while Congress met to certify President Biden’s win, and turned to an Enron-era obstruction of justice statute to elevate some of those… [read post]
This landmark decision stems from a case initiated two years ago, where WUC challenged UK government agencies for failing to investigate imports of cotton produced in the Uyghur Region. [read post]
The question this case presents is whether the Eighth Amendment grants federal judges primary responsibility for assessing those causes and devising those responses. [read post]
Further, it was stated that “[o]ut of the approximately 64,000 criminal cases reported to the Sentencing Commission in Fiscal Year 2022, more than 7600 involved convictions under Section 922(g)(1)…[t]hose convictions accounted for nearly 12 percent of all federal criminal cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The order was affirmed in part and the case was remanded to allow the District Court to amend its order returning the children to Tereshchenko in France by adding conditions designed to serve this important purpose. [read post]