Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Douglas v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Douglas v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:48 am
Abbott Reed v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:05 am
That’s what was alleged in the recent Florida Second District Court of Appeals case of Panzera v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
However, if you or a loved one have been convicted based solely on an out of court statement and the witness or victim was not available for cross examination, you should call the Southern California appeals attorneys at Wallin & Klarich immediately. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
La Crosse Health & Rehab, 138 Idaho 859, 864, 71 P.3d 458 (2003) had been wrong. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
Conversant and Xiaomi v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
Most puzzling is City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:22 pm
" The California Public Defenders Association had submitted an amicus curiae that went further, stating the court violated several constitutional assurances including the right to be tried by a jury of a cross-section of the community and effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
In deciding this appeal, the court of appeals stated that the trial court has discretion in determining which exhibits are provided to the jury during deliberations. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:27 pm
The CGL carrier appealed the trial court’s ruling. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
On April 28, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
The Court harmonized its holding with the language of the Supreme Court in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
Google Jawbone Plaintiff Can Invoke California Choice of Law Provision in Service Agreement If You’re Going To Incorporate Online T&Cs Into a Printed Contract, Do It Right–Holdbrook v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:15 am
Fuzu Li v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 2:49 pm
Reneaux cares about a lot, as he's spending over 21 years in prison as a result of the Court of Appeal's application of this principle.The bookends of this doctrine are well-established. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
A California Court of Appeal reversed, holding that the requested instruction was an accurate statement of California law and that refusal to give it was prejudicial error. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 5:31 pm
BJ’s Restaurant, the California Court of Appeal recently ruled that employers are not required to reimburse employees for slip-resistant shoes as they do not qualify as a uniform under California law. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 11:49 am
Lorenzo v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
