Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,500
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2019, 2:45 am
Delaware Company Adopts “Gender Quota” Bylaw A Delaware-incorporated company that’s headquartered in California has filed a Form 8-K to report adoption of a “board diversity” bylaw. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
In Mallory v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Here on the Reed Smith side of the blog, three of our core contributors are located in Pennsylvania and California. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:03 pm
McDonald, managing member, and Richard V. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm
The inflexibility of Apple's approach is, by the way, another reason (besides the 30% cut) why NFT startups complain about the app tax.Apple's inflexibility also affects currency conversion (Apple recently announced massive price increases in the eurozone and several other countries, and many app makers might actually prefer to keep the old euro prices).When I last commented on the pending Pepper v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 3:35 pm
,dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications (07-512) - availability of “price squeeze” claims between competitors. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:00 am
California law has a similar requirement, with similar defenses. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:35 am
Chavez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:56 am
On October 15, the Halston company fileda copyright infringement suit in the central district of California against G-III, which is the exclusive licensor for Calvin Klein. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:40 pm
Relying upon Grace v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:50 pm
Comcast Corporation v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 4:14 pm
In Ritz Camera & Image, LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:16 am
Skilstaf, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
The Law of Pricing, Including Resale Price Maintenance in California After Leegin Participants in twenty-first-century commerce face many price-related issues, including bundling, below cost pricing, price discrimination, and resale price maintenance. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:24 am
LinkLine (CVSG 1/22/08) (whether a company that has no duty under antitrust law to sell to others at wholesale can be held liable for the narrow difference between its wholesale and retail price levels) No. 07-539, Progress Energy v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
” Norgart v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 8:31 am
Harbor Breeze Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:36 am
One doesn't even need to be wealthy to withhold payments in whole or in part (though it obviously makes it easier to deal with litigation costs and risks).In Apple v. [read post]
