Search for: "California v. Arizona"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Douglas v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:33 am
Douglas v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
In Brown v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:47 pm
Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
The cases to be heard — consolidated for one hour of oral argument (probably in March) — are Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Further evidence of the breadth of the controversy is that Hibdon has also sued residents of Arizona, North Carolina, Texas and New Hampshire relating to postings those individuals made on rec.sport.jetski.FN5 FN5 The Memorandum Opinion entered on May 14, 2003 in the case of Hibdon v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 6:02 am
The Ninth Circuit has jurisdiction over Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:25 pm
Arizona Department of Corrections, 2011 U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:23 pm
Brown v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:56 am
Attorneys for the prisoners in Tennessee, Arizona and California argued before U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
See Walker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:59 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Arizona v California gave the Secretary the right to reduce different states’ allotments to river water based upon drought conditions. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 10:10 am
I tried to tell them that the Arizona/California method of requiring the jury to be unanimous one way or the other was the way to go, and they blew me off. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
Moreover, and more importantly, the logic of the Arizona case (which the Court said was in the same vein as that of Smiley v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:55 am
Jay Wallace (University of California, Berkeley)12:45-1:05pmCommentaryPekka Väyrynen (University of California, Davis)1:05-1:45pmDiscussion SessionEND OF CONFERENCEAgain, conference registration is free but required for attendance. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 11:30 pm
A California federal district court held that plaintiff had alleged viable Eighth Amendment, Equal Protection and RLUIPA claims, but not a free exercise violation.In Marr v. [read post]
14 Jul 2007, 3:32 pm
LEXIS 48804 (D AZ, July 5, 2007), an Arizona federal district court rejected a prisoner's challenge to a jail's policy of allowing only three detainees per week to attend religious services.In Al-Barr v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 1:46 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed Bennett v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 9:31 am
v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:46 am
California goes even further and lets voters “designate another person to return the ballot”—meaning that California does not require a ballot collector to have any specific relationship to the voter. [read post]
