Search for: "California v. EPA" Results 521 - 540 of 684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
  THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS- Five Meetings On GHG Regs For Power Plants & Refineries - Senate Hearing On BP Commission Report & Oil/Gas Drilling- Chairman Upton Statement On NRC Delays In Plant Licensing - Groups Say 123 House Members Are Supporting Anti-EPA Bills- USDA's On-Farm Energy Audit/Implementation Initiative- EPA Wants Comments On Vapor Intrusion At Superfund Sites- EPA Environmental Justice Small Grants Opportunity- Northern… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:41 pm by Keith Rizzardi
Relatedly, Home Builders Ass’n of Northern California v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 pm by WIMS
      "The EPA and the Department of Transportation worked with auto makers, labor unions, states like California, and environmental advocates this past spring to turn a tangle of rules into one aggressive new standard [See WIMS 4/1/10]. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:29 am by Shari Shapiro
     EPA Regulation Of GHG Under the Clean Air Act EPA limits on greenhouse gases for power plants which also went into effect January 1 (a quick fact sheet from the EPA is available here). [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 12:52 pm by Dan Farber
At the state level, the big news will be the rollout of California’s cap-and-trade system. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 11:22 am by Mike
Tyco agrees but argues that since the EPA has not yet approved the remediation plan, there is no plan in place. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: ‘Greed’ and overreaching forfeit sanctions award: Goodman Ball, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:56 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Is EPA Treading On Thin Ice With Its Climate Change Regulations? [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm by WIMS
Consequently, the emissions that may result from the consumptive burning of North Baja gas are not reasonably foreseeable within the definition provided by the EPA's regulations. [read post]