Search for: "California v. Gross"
Results 521 - 540
of 857
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2010, 9:20 am
Zimring, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:11 pm
Gordon v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
Katfriend Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan (University of Cambridge, King’s College and Max Planck Institute), kindly hosted by Eleonora, investigates those really questions in this post.* Galileo sees stars as ESA logo marches on Jeremy reports on the General Court of the European Union’s decision in Case T-450/11 Galileo International Technology LLC v OHIM, the European Commission and the European Space Agency (ESA). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 3:19 am
Breidbart contended this amounted to a constructive denial of his inspection rights because his poor health limited his ability to travel from his California home. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:42 am
In that case (Alexander v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 5:05 am
A recent child injury in California involved a new water slide at a water park in California. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:41 am
His attorneys are now urging the court to expand their ruling in Graham v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 5:05 am
A recent child injury in California involved a new water slide at a water park in California. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
State, 73 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 2000) ............................................................................ 15 California First Amendment Coalition v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Roberson v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm
Although the rule insulates the decision makers from ordinary negligence,[7] it can typically be overcome by a showing of gross negligence.[8] States may differ in whether the rule applies to both directors and officers (e.g., Delaware[9]), only to directors (e.g., Florida[10]), or only to “outside” directors (e.g., California[11]). [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:13 am
They wanted to conceal information about the total miles driven “on app” by drivers using the Uber application; the gross fares; and the service fee to Uber on those fares (from 2010 through 2016) for several categories of Uber drivers in California and Massachusetts. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:35 am
Asserting a claim of malice, O'Donnell alleged that Cox & Smith's conduct constituted gross negligence. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:31 pm
In one of my recently decided appeals, Plotnik v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:05 pm
– Roth IRA: The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 created this type of account, named for Senator William V. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:18 pm
The remedy offered was to vacate the plea and let the defendant decide if he wanted to plead guilty again with the correction in place giving him a longer sentence.The California courts thought that was an okay way to deal with it. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Watts, No. 07-2462 In an action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 alleging that the defendants' failure to supervise resulted in arrests without probable cause, illegal warrantless searches, and use of excessive force, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiffs failed to establish that the actions of defendants amounted to supervisory encouragement, condonation or acquiescence, or gross negligence amounting to deliberate indifference. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 23, 2008 US v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975) and properly grant a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the state trial court failed to rule formally on a defendant’s request for self-representation? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
California 1/1/15 FAGI FTI before NOLs and special deds. [read post]
