Search for: "California v. Howard"
Results 521 - 540
of 719
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 5:42 am
Keller, a college football player, had filed a complaint in the Northern District of California against a number of defendants including Electronic Arts (“EA”) on a several theories, including a violation of his rights of publicity under California statutory and common law. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:03 pm
Howard Mintz has this story in the San Jose Mercury-News. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:19 pm
., v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Fell Kennedy v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:22 am
The glaring legal problem in Stern v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
In Finland, the choice of a name is subject to the Names Act (Nimilaki), administered by the Population Register Centre (Väestörekisterikeskus), which operates under the Ministry of Finance. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:07 pm
The case continues as Stern v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
An injunction was applied for but again was rejected.At the Supreme Court level there has only been one case of Zacchini v Scripps- Howard Broadcasting Company, otherwise known as the Human Cannonball case where the defendants broadcast the entirety of a 15 second clip of a guy shooting himself out of a canon. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
Phelps, and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
But in June, the Supreme Court in Holder v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:21 am
v=u0lPuN03b40 Dr. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Nursing Homes: PATIENTS SUFFER SUB-PAR CARE AT CALIFORNIA FACILITIES, CLASS ACTION SAYS, Valentine v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
The “new” California law that Mr. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 2:10 pm
Howard Roffman, in turn, supervised Mr. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
Demetirus Charles Howard, 2010 Cal. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
As a California lemon law attorney, Mr. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:54 pm
Here's just a quick note on Monday's US Supreme Court ruling in Costco Wholesale Corp v Omega SA, which ended in a 4-4 draw (Justice Kagan sat this one out). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
The day’s activity generated substantial coverage, and in particular, the oral argument in the California prison overcrowding case, Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 3:10 pm
On November 23, 2010, the California Supreme Court declined review of the First Appellate District’s decision in Howard v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:29 am
An attorney for Oracle, Geoffrey Howard, said that the scale of TomorrowNow's infringement was "unprecedented. [read post]
