Search for: "Chambers v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 4,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Sales LJ said that the correct approach to the instruction of experts, their role, and the contents of their reports was set out in the Practice Direction of the Immigration and Asylum Chambers of the First-tier and Upper Tribunal. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 7:54 am
Then he reversed himself and lawyers now are in state and federal courts trying to save him from lethal injection. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 2:31 pm
In its judgment in Case T-36/04 API v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 8:37 pm
LETHAL RECIPE Dosages for the lethal "three-drug cocktail" were posted on a wall near the death chamber at the prison in Lucasville, Ohio, in 2005.By ELIZABETH WEILWHEN the Supreme Court stayed an execution last week for the third time in October, making the month the first in nearly three years with no executions, the justices sent a clear message to the states: Don't execute anybody until we have decided Baze v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:45 am
" For example: V-RING for directional antennas, the primary components of which were shaped in the form of a "v" and a "ring;" CHAMBERED PIPE for an exhaust system consisting of a series of small tuning chambers; MATCHBOX SERIES for toys sold in boxes having the size and appearance of matchboxes; BEEFLAKES for frozen, thinly sliced beef; TOOBS for bathroom and kitchen fixtures in the shape of tubes; STRAIGHTS for straight legged jeans;… [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 7:47 am
In Fields v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:05 am
In Doe I v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:23 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 2:59 pm
In a recent case, Donelson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
For the decision, the Chamber stated the following: “…five mitigating circumstances, namely: (i) your admission of guilt; (ii) your cooperation with the Prosecution; (iii) the remorse and the empathy you expressed for the victims; (iv) your initial reluctance to commit the crime and the steps you took to limit the damage caused; and, (v) even if of limited importance, your good behavior in detention despite your family situation. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
For the decision, the Chamber stated the following: “…five mitigating circumstances, namely: (i) your admission of guilt; (ii) your cooperation with the Prosecution; (iii) the remorse and the empathy you expressed for the victims; (iv) your initial reluctance to commit the crime and the steps you took to limit the damage caused; and, (v) even if of limited importance, your good behavior in detention despite your family situation. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress Author: Nadia Verrelli and Lori Chambers ISBN: 9780774838092 Publisher: UBC Press Series: Landmark Cases in Canadian Law Page Count: 208 Publication Date: August 2021 Regular Price: $27.95 (paperback) | Series subscriber price: $22.00 Excerpt: From the Introduction. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:02 am
The jury is deliberating in the Oracle v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
In chambers until November, the Justices have left no shortage of topics for discussion during their absence. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:41 am
(Business Roundtable and US Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Mar 2025, 5:49 am
At the time, the Appeals Chamber held that under customary international law, heads of state do not enjoy immunity before international criminal tribunals—distinguishing them from national courts, where such immunity remains uncontested—, including, in the Chamber’s view, the ICC. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 8:03 am
The September 5, 2017, decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Bărbulescu v Romania (Bărbulescu) has interrupted a recent trend toward limiting privacy in the European workplace. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:54 pm
It will be interesting to see whether there is a reference to the Grand Chamber. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 10:41 am
This includes last September's Nokia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
§1257 under Michigan v. [read post]