Search for: "Charlie Savage"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
Ben also posted another response, along with a concluding reply from Charlie Savage. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:07 pm
I have been consumed for the past week with Lawfare’s relaunch, but I have not forgotten that I promised to address Charlie Savage’s response to my critique of his recent story on NSA cybersecurity surveillance under Section 702. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm
We mock Charlie Savage for his overwrought New York Times article claiming that NSA’s cybersecurity monitoring is a privacy issue. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
The authors of the New York Times story published alongside the documents—Charlie Savage, Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson and Henrik Moltke—interpreted the documents as evidence that, in order to detect malicious foreign hackers, the Obama administration had quietly expanded the agency's warrantless surveillance of Americans’ international Internet traffic. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm
Ben and Charlie Savage engaged in detailed back and forth, as Ben critiqued Charlie’s recent New York Times coverage of NSA’s 702 program and Charlie tried to show where Ben’s critique went wrong. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 10:30 am
(See Ben’s critique of the Times’ reporting and Charlie Savage’s response, here). [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
” Charlie Savage, the lead author on the Times story, responded to Ben’s criticism, saying, “Your snark depends upon a straw man and a distortion. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:01 pm
Charlie Savage of the New York Times writes in response to my post this morning critiquing his story yesterday: Dear Ben: Thank you for letting me respond to your critique on Lawfare. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:22 am
Look, I’m a fan of Charlie Savage, who has done a lot of great and careful work over the years. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 12:49 pm
In the New York Times, Charlie Savage explores some of the work-arounds the intelligence community may invoke until the gaps in surveillance authority are filled. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:00 am
” – New York Times reporter Charlie Savage, in a story in the newspaper on May 25, after the Senate recessed until Sunday, May 31, following a refusal of the chamber to extend – even for one day beyond the June 1 deadline — the existing National Security Agency telephone data sweeps. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:29 pm
(Here is Charlie Savage’s story on Dan when he left the White House; here is a brief tribute from his former colleague Marty Lederman.) [read post]
7 May 2015, 1:10 pm
Charlie Savage of the NY Times reports that the provision of the USA Patriot Act known as Section 215, which permits the FBI to collect relevant business records in the course of counterterrorism investigations, "cannot be legitimately interpreted to permit the bulk collection of domestic calling cards. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:24 am
Charlie Savage of the New York Times has more. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:25 am
Phone Data Collection Illegal, Appeals Court Rules": Charlie Savage of The New York Times has a news update that begins, "A federal appeals court in New York on Thursday ruled that the once-secret National Security Agency program that is systematically collecting Americans' phone records in bulk is illegal. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:00 am
Charlie Baker’s inauguration committee will return donations from two lobbying firms that exceeded a limit he imposed for lobbyist contributions. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
As Charlie Savage (among many others) has noted, the President thinks that not closing GTMO “endangers national security,” and the Islamic State beheadings of Americans have been tied to GTMO. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 3:52 pm
In November, Charlie Savage at the New York Times reported that the provision could mean that: as long as there was an older counterterrorism investigation still open, the court could keep issuing Section 215 orders to phone companies indefinitely for that investigation. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
The Times’ Charlie Savage, who reported Monday on the contents of the documents, focused on the moves the FISC made in order to justify and approve of the NSA’s warrantless surveillance program of foreigners. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:46 am
Charlie Savage of the Times shares 2007 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) orders that enabled the National Security Agency (NSA) to, before obtaining judicial sanction, collect from U.S. networks the emails and phone calls of foreigners. [read post]
