Search for: "Commander v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 5,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2008, 6:22 pm
Matter of Joseph Confreda v New York State Comptroller This Article 78 proceeding was brought about by petitioner, Joseph Confreda, to review a determination of respondent Comptroller denying petitioner accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
In distinguishing Garcetti v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:06 am
But now the issue is in state court and state laws will be at issue. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:18 pm
Congressional Brief : 87 Members of Congress signed this brief defending ICWA in the four principle arguments in the case State AG Brief : 23 states and the District of Columbia signed on to this brief, which highlights how ICWA allows and encourages tribal-state relations in the area of child welfare. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am
Every four years, Americans go to the polls to elect the individual who will serve as our chief executive officer, commander in chief of the armed forces, head of state, and who, since the Truman administration, is known by the acronym, POTUS – President of the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 12:32 pm
Rather, our duty is to faithfully interpret the Constitution.That duty commands that we apply the Eighth Amendment, not our sympathies. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:20 am
Fyk With respect to traceability, the court explains: [230] is a civil liability shield for private parties and does not enable, command, or delegate any state action. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Maurer notes that in one case (U.S. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:57 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
§1983Broadley v Hardman, US Court of Appeals, First Circuit, No. 08-1342Edmund F. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
In a foreshadowing of United States v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:12 am
Only in 2008, Koh made the following remarks in testimony before a Senate subcommittee: the Bush Administration has consistently asserted a constitutional theory of unfettered executive power, based on extraordinarily broad interpretations of Article II’s “Commander-in-Chief” Clause and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 12:36 pm
Regarding mutuality, the Order states: “In light of [AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:58 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 11:48 am
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 11:48 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
Direct Command --Constitution of the United States Article I, V --Notes and Questions --b. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
