Search for: "Condon v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2014, 11:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
They propose a “meaningful modification” of the Court’s holding in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
  The women who work for such churches thus are virtually the only women in the United States who will not be afforded this new national benefit, which I described in further detail in this post. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 11:20 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted a new hearing this past Friday in Joffe v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
After these block quotations, the Court moves seamlessly to simply assert that the use of s 377 to ‘perpetrate harassment, blackmail and torture’ is ‘neither mandated by the section nor condoned by it’ [51]. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Current rules give unfair advantage to mass-litigation attorneys targeting Texas consumersLabeau v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:09 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada today drew a starkly defined line between the power of the courts and the mandate of regulators when it comes to restitution in a potential securities class action.In AIC Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:15 am
  Or not....On December 10, the Beastie Boys filed an Answer and asserted counterclaims including copyright infringement, trade mark infringement, unfair competition, and misappropriation of right of publicity (under California state law). [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 11:24 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:32 pm
This contract stated that the bag business sold by Baquet included the Benelux word mark NATHAN, which he had had registered in 1991 for leather items, clothing and shoes in Classes 18 and 25. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:27 am by Barry Sookman
The Supreme Court released a landmark decision today in the  Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]