Search for: "Connecticut Technology" Results 521 - 540 of 2,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2019, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
Christopher Tomlins identified the treatise as a legal technology with set purposes. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:49 am
Simpson (Robbery in third degree; assault of elderly person in third degree; ""The three year limitation for the filing of a petition for a writ of error coram nobis has been the law in Connecticut for more than 130 years. . . . [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:19 am by musicandcopyright
Pressing need for the music industry to address the vinyl squeeze The vinyl revival has proved to be more than a mere blip as consumers continue to demonstrate appetite for the vintage technology. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:53 am by Czepiga Daly Pope & Perri LLC
Related Posts: The Empowered Caregiver-Part 1 33 Resources to Help Caregivers 3 Respite Programs So You Can Take a Break Long-Distance Caregiving: 3 Tips for Reducing Day-to-Day Stress The post The Empowered Caregiver: Learning to Accept Help appeared first on Connecticut Estate Planning Attorneys Blog. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:56 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act made a number of changes affecting “business associates. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:50 pm by David Klein
Essentially, the authors requested that Congress, “set the floor and not the ceiling in any privacy law, and to allow states to provide additional protections in response to changing technology and data privacy protection practices. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:05 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
" Marie Grady of the Connecticut Law Tribune reports on proposed new ABA rules that relate to the use of cloud storage services like Dropbox. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 12:23 pm by Hedge Fund Lawyer
Connecticut Reminder to Exempt IAs – the Connecticut Department of Banking sent out a regulatory reminder about managers who utilize the Connecticut IA registration exemption (more information in our post about the Connecticut ERA filing) in the state. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:20 am by Charley Lozada
On the Federal level, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act also requires prior express written consent when auto-dial technology is used to send promotional messages. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:04 am by The Docket Navigator
(“CPI”), filed in the District of Connecticut, WhitServe obtained an $8.3 Million verdict. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:21 pm by admin
Although the prevalence of recording technology can infringe upon privacy, it can also serve as a convenient, potent tool capable of protecting civil rights. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:38 pm by admin
Although the prevalence of recording technology can infringe upon privacy, it can also serve as a convenient, potent tool capable of protecting civil rights. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:16 pm by admin
Although the prevalence of recording technology can infringe upon privacy, it can also serve as a convenient, potent tool capable of protecting civil rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Meanwhile, a combination of court rulings and technological innovation will ratchet up demand considerably for these services in the near term.First, re: court rulings. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:38 pm by admin
Although the prevalence of recording technology can infringe upon privacy, it can also serve as a convenient, potent tool capable of protecting civil rights. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:03 am by Glenn Reynolds
Christopher Dodd, the former Connecticut senator who now leads the MPAA, hasn’t given up on his dream of censoring the Internet. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 10:42 pm by Mary Anne Peck
Connecticut SB 2 would establish reporting requirements for developers who rely on AI as “a controlling factor” in the making of any “consequential decision. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 1:27 pm by Katie Gray
Connecticut has given tentative approval to the NU-NStar merger in a draft order. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:48 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The investigation is based on a November 5, 2010 complaint filed by United Technologies Corporation of Hartford, Connecticut alleging violation of Section 337 in the importation into the U.S. and sale of certain turbomachinery blades, engines, and components thereof that infringe U.S. [read post]