Search for: "Cooper v. Morales"
Results 521 - 540
of 593
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Or on life support, at least - MEI v JCM American Corp stayed pending outcome of Mars v Coin Acceptors (Property, intangible) O2 Micro - ITC judge grants in part O2's motion for summary determination of importa [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 12:30 pm
Responding to predictive asymmetry's headlong rush toward moral hazard and prudentialism's more subtle drift, this Article recommends an iterative approach that views each branch as a player in a cooperative game. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– response to Sidley Austin newsletter on proposals regarding green technology (IPKat) Invention harvesting vs directed inventing (Canada Patent Blog) Flash of genius – Some lessons history has taught regarding IP strategy (IPEG) Inventors beware: Yugo prices suggest Yugo quality (IP Watchdog) Global - Copyright Theodore Levitt and copyright (Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars) The why of property-talk in the copyright wars (Moral Panics and the… [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:45 am
Here’s one more quote, from one more judge, that seems appropriate; Harry Blackmun’s 1994 dissent in Callins v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 5:54 am
Boies and Olson answer ADF/Cooper's argument, but on the need to investigate Prop. 8' intent, they say nothing more than that they will show it "was driven by discriminatory intent, animus, and moral disapproval of gay and lesbian individuals. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 1:20 pm
So for my purposes here, it is A.P. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:28 am
This at least is the conclusion one can draw from Case T-28/08, Mars v OHIM, in which the Court of First Instance of the European Communities confirmed that its Community trade mark for the three-dimensional shape of its Bounty bar was invalidly registered (see commentary on this decision here). [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:04 am
Beck (2001)Cooper v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:34 am
Morales, 25 A.D.3d 624, 807 N.Y.S.2d 142 (2nd Dept. 2006) In making this determination the court should look to such factors as the amount of time spent with the police, whether an individual was handcuffed or restrained in any way, whether there was any questioning, the location of the questioning, was the atmosphere unduly coercive, the individual's degree of cooperation, whether the individual was apprised of his or her rights, and whether the nature of the questioning was… [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:43 pm
Our very survival has never required greater cooperation and understanding among all people from all places than at this moment in history. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:59 pm
On the other hand, both church and state have always spoken to moral limits on human behavior. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Patent Prospector) (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Techdirt) (Hal Wegner) Reactions to Patent Reform Bill 2009 (IP Watchdog) (Patent Baristas) (IP Watchdog) (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) Global Global - General World IP Day, 26 April, approaching (IPKat) Global -… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:55 am
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY - NONCOOPERATION - EUO - SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE - NEGLIGENCE CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST PROPERTY INSURER - DEFAMATION CLAIM AGAINST SPECIAL INVESTIGATOR - PUNITIVE DAMAGES LeBaron v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:48 am
In State v. [read post]
