Search for: "Cost v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 31,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
We consider that TMs have costs as well as benefits; we should think about the costs as well as benefits of these proxies. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm
The appeal court upheld the order for retroactive spousal support and the costs award, finding that it was permissible to set off compensation against costs, citing Jamieson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:49 am
” People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:33 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:57 pm
SE v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:04 pm
The latest is the landmark ruling by Justice Aylen of the Federal Court in Province of Alberta et al v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 11:13 am
In Small v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a set of stay applications, consolidated under the caption Ohio v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Leon Petroleum, LLC v Carl S. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 1:48 pm
This is precisely what happened in West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court, however, held in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 8:08 am
However, the court contested this, stating that, just because this is an uncustomary rule, this does not signify that it is extraneous. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:56 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in Carl v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 2:05 pm
For instance, in the case of Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Zapata Off-Shore Co. and Carnival Cruise Lines v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
The case, LePage v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
§ 10786(i)(1) for medical-legal evaluator’s attorney’s fees and costs… Shamsian (Eliza) v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Significantly, SB 699 also creates a private right of action, authorizing employees, former employees, and prospective employees to seek injunctive relief and / or actual damages, and entitles a prevailing employee to recover reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
From the states’ point of view Title 32 deployments are desirable because the personnel and other costs are borne by federal taxpayers. [read post]
