Search for: "Court of Appeals, 5th District" Results 521 - 540 of 5,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2008, 2:22 pm
The Court of Appeals opinion July 28th in the case of Gary Community School Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:00 pm
Effective November 1, 2014 the Fourth District  implemented the following electronic devices policy (which the 5th District has had all this year):Uniform Policy on Public Use of Electronic Devices in Court of Appeal Court RoomsLaptop computers and electronic tablets may be used in the court room but must be silenced and placed in “airplane mode” at all times. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 11:59 am
Yesterday proved to be a tough day for defendants who had received below-guideline sentences from district courts. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:55 am by Gideon Alper
The case was originally decided by the 5th District Court of Appeal in Florida.Oral arguments are typically held at 9AM, so check twitter streams and the court’s website for the latest updates.What was T.M.H. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:18 am
Joanne Wojcik reports for Business Insurance online that the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has granted a rehearing en banc. to determine whether a climate change lawsuit can go forward. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision to strike class allegations after only limited discovery. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 8:37 pm by admin
Folks who think the most aggressive lawyers are the best or most effective lawyers should read the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s February 3, 2012, opinion in Irizarry v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
[(The appeal is an appeal to the District Court, so it will likely be resolved fairly quickly.)] [read post]
24 May 2021, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
First Liberty Institute which represents defendant says that it will appeal the decision to the 5th Circuit. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:27 am by Andrew Williamson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently held that an unaccepted offer of judgment does not moot a lead plaintiff’s claim in a putative class action. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 6:57 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On February 15, 2023, the California Supreme Court denied the petitions for review and issued an order decertifying the Second District Court of Appeal’s controversial (and previously published) opinion in G.I. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
Sterling Chemicals (5th Cir. 10/13/11) (successor Liability/Amendment of ERISA Plan through Asset Purchase Agreement in bankruptcy); Hier die Entscheidung: In the United States Court of Appeals for the fifth circuit US v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion originally filed on August 26, and later certified for publication on September 16, 2020, the Third District Court of Appeal dismissed a plaintiff group’s (“Parkford”) appeal from an adverse judgment in a CEQA/land use case as moot. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:29 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:25 pm
  Rejection of a Per Se Rule for Corporate Insiders In affirming the Bankruptcy Court's decision to recharacterize Grossman's claims, the Court of Appeals explicitly rejected the District Court's finding that only the claims of insiders can be recharacterized as equity. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 3:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On July 13, 2022, the California Supreme Court denied numerous depublication requests with respect to, and declined to review on its own motion, the First District Court of Appeal’s decision in Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 9:00 am
  The District Court ultimately assessed a $6 million civil penalty against CITGO, which EPA appealed. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 9:33 am by Sandy T. Fox
A Central Florida wife will receive a second chance to make her case for an award of alimony, thanks to a recent decision issued by the 5th District Court of Appeal. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Oct. 5, 2016), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) considered UCL and CLRA claims involving the cost of emergency room medical care for uninsured ("self-pay") patients. [read post]