Search for: "Crop v. Crop" Results 521 - 540 of 1,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 7:46 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
  The guidance also notes that the 2018 Farm Bill, enacted on December 12, 2018, does provide a statutory definition for PBSs, which is:  “a substance or micro-organism that, when applied to seeds, plants, or the rhizosphere, stimulates natural processes to enhance or benefit nutrient uptake, nutrient efficiency, tolerance to abiotic stress, or crop quality and yield. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Natale v. 9199-4467 Quebec Inc., 2023 WL 4850531, No. 21-CV-6775 (JS)(SIL) (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Not only do pollinators help increase crop yields. . . [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:31 pm by WIMS
Circuit, denied an en banc reconsideration [See WIMS 1/16/13] of Grocery Manufacturers Association v. [read post]
On January 9, 2019, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa declared this law unconstitutional in Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:00 am by Mark Meyer
So you then need to go to case law to see how the courts interpret and apply that distinction.A seminal case distinguishing a food from a drug is Nutrilab, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:30 am by familoo
” 18 One of the merits of great advocates, as Lord Pearce pointed out in Rondel v Worsley [1969] 1 AC 191 at p 255G, has been the ability ruthlessly to sacrifice nine points and win on the tenth and best. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:26 pm
- Pittsburgh lawyer David Wagner of Reed Smith on the firm's Environmental Law Resource Estate of Jorgensen v. [read post]