Search for: "D Booker" Results 521 - 540 of 614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2009, 3:53 pm
Here is the abstract: Much has been written about the Booker revolution that led to the fall of the mandatory Federal Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am by Roshonda Scipio
(Robert Jefferson) TITLE Up from history : the life of Booker T. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:47 pm
  If that's the line, I'd probably take the over, but  maybe that's just because I have never been a Bills fan. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
US, No. 07-2709 Denial of a motion for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 from a conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute controlled substances is affirmed over claims of error regarding whether: 1) defendant was denied conflict-free counsel; and 2) Booker applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:02 am
Never mind: get the cable bookers to line up women on opposite sides of the lipstick divide and let them claw at each other! [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:52 am by Keith
Little Rock, AR 72227 Knisley, Kathryn Bess 303 Booker St. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:38 am
" Comment Like Judge Rakoff's decision in Adelson, Parris is as an important milestone in the post-Booker path to freedom from what Judge Block describes as "the shackles of the mandatory guidelines regime. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 2:28 am
I'd say that Penelope Fitzgerald gets the reviewer she deserves when Julian Barnes undertakes to examine her letters (link). [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:49 pm
Booker -- which did recognize a defendant's right only before demolishing its significance -- there aren't separate opinions in Philip Morris regarding the "merits" and the "remedy. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:23 pm
  In addition, I suspect at least a few more post-Booker issues might still garner the Justices' attention (perhaps acquitted conduct or other burden-of-proof issues). [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 4:34 am
Since Booker, many district courts have been reluctant to sentence below the Guidelines even if they really think the guideline sentence is too high. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:25 am
[D]istrict courts should first calculate the correct Guidelines range and rule on any departure motions. . . . [read post]