Search for: "D. C-W." Results 521 - 540 of 4,253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
[In Locke,] "[w]e conclude[d] that Florida's license requirement [was] constitutional under the First Amendment[.] [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
 Claude Monet, Turkeys Unfinished Decoration 1876 Musée D'OrsayThe object, then, is to try to rationalize an order to the quite dynamic states of norm-regulation construction in the many spaces that exist above, beyond or between states. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Does the D have enough power for us to be concerned? [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rebecca Tushnet Bad Spaniels, Deceptive Raptors, and Tiny Hands: The Persistence of Commercial Speech as a Category Jennifer Rothman has done related work, but her focus has been on the different definitions of commerciality across IP regimes; I’m interested in a different question: holding constant the definition of commercial speech as defined by First Amendment jurisprudence, which is basically speech that does no more than merely propose a commercial transaction, does the Lanham Act cover… [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 8:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
May be able to look at geog. markets to see R and D effects, but not yet. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 3:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Exclusivity b/c of tacit knowledge and employee mobility restrictions too. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
I’d also be really interested in discussing the role of gender. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 12:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Rosenblatt: CASE Act may be challenging for clinics b/c there’s not a lot of legal rigor to it and b/c it’s uncertain—you might recommend a P try it but also that a D opt out. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Intentional copying by D often leads to presumption of secondary meaning. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Forum-shopping from TTAB/federal court; D secured transfer from Mass. to Cal. b/c standard for proving abandonment is not consistent through US. [read post]
If the archivist does not agree, Subsection 2203(d) requires the president to provide a disposal schedule to “the appropriate Congressional Committees” 60 days in advance of destroying the records. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:49 am
In re OMT Belforte S.R.L., Serial No. 79255285 (February 8, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am by Roger Parloff
In January, a group of North Carolina voters filed a 34-page petition to block Rep. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:22 am by Matthias Weller
Blanquet-Angulo, Alejandra “Les Zones d’ombre de la Convention de La Haye du 2 Juillet 2019”, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé (RIDC), 73 (2021), pp. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Arizona 2.59% > $0 2.59% > $0 $12,950 $25,900 n.a. n.a. $100 credit (d, f, g, w, pp) 3.34% > $27,808 3.34% > $55,615             4.17% > $55,615 4.17% > $111,229             4.50% > $166,843 4.50% > $333,684           Arkansas 2.00% > $0 2.00% > $0 $2,200 $4,400 $29 credit $58 credit $29 credit (d, h, i, o, oo) 4.00% > $4,300 4.00% > $4,300    … [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 4:55 am by Sebastian Conrad
C-497/20, Randstad Italia SpA Der Beitrag EuGH: Recht auf wirksamen Rechtsbehelf gilt auch im Vergabeverfahren erschien zuerst auf Dr. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:36 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
” This duty can arise when the undisclosed information “cause[s] an unreasonable safety hazard” or when (1) the omission is material, (2) the defect is central to the product’s function, and (3) one of the following is the case: (a) the defendant is the plaintiff’s fiduciary; (b) the defendant has exclusive knowledge of material facts not known or reasonably accessible to the plaintiff; (c) the defendant actively conceals a material fact from the plaintiff; or… [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:32 am by Nathan Dorn
The assize judges that applied it in that case were likely encouraged by King James’ Dæmonologie as well as the 1603 Witchcraft Act (which criminalized witchcraft but did not relate to the swimming test) that James I enacted in his first year as King of England. [read post]