Search for: "DOES 1-101" Results 521 - 540 of 3,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Therefore, according to the opponents, the appeal should be considered as inadmissible, because it did not meet the provisions of R 101(1). [1.2] The board does not concur with this position of the opponents. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:47 am by Diane Tweedlie
The board in arriving at this conclusion does not deviate from G 1/10 (see point 3).1. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
A grant of Family Unity benefits does not qualify as such an admission. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 7:05 am by Brian Scott
Garson, EsquireLIPTON, WEINBERGER & HUSICKagarson@lwh-law.com http://www.lwh-law.com http://www.garson-law.com 201 North Jackson StreetMedia, PA 19063Voice +1 610.565.7630Fax +1 610.565.7631 [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by Dennis Crouch
 I would suggest that the language does not quite achieve the purpose suggested. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:29 am by Jason Rantanen
  Thus, one determines: (1) does the claim recite an ineligible concept (natural phenomena, natural law or abstract idea), and (2) if so, does the claim recite sufficient additional elements to make the claim one to an application of the concept, rather than to the concept itself? [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:22 pm by Ellen Savage, J.D.
Formula 1: Weekly Earnings of $101 or More If the employee’s weekly earnings when she returns to work are $101 or more, the first 25% does not count against UI benefits. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 1:24 pm by Benjamin Herbst
Under criminal law section 5-101, marijuana does not include hemp for the purpose of criminal prosecution. [read post]
§ 101: the court determines (1) whether the claims at issue are directed to one of those patent-ineligible concepts; and if so, the court asks (2) what else is there in the claims? [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 1:07 pm by Daniel Shaviro
All else equal, (1) is better for the employer, and (2) is better for the employee. [read post]