Search for: "DUKES v. STATE"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2018, 6:30 am
Hamm (The Ohio State University), Michael J. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
United States, 86 F. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:58 am
In that sense, Massachusetts v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 2:30 am
Windell’s advice, I wrote a senior thesis on a Louisiana Supreme Court case, Eulalie and her children v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011). [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 9:03 am
… The case of Nebraska v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 12:18 pm
Supreme Court in Carlesi v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Second, with respect to the Caremark claim, the more recent exposition of Caremark in Stone v. [read post]
24 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
• What are potential approaches for physicians, including those practicing in states where it is legal, those who receive a request for access when the practice is legal in nearby states but not in the state of practice, and those who practice in a state where it is legal but are personally opposed to physician-assisted death. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 8:21 am
In City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 6:02 am
Dukes and Comcast v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Chief Justice Strine dissented, excoriating Duke for its "business strategy … to run the company in a manner that purposely skirted, and in many ways consciously violated, important environmental laws" (City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 10:01 am
In the recent opinion by the Delaware Supreme Court of Chancery in City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 5:17 pm
In response to the December 1, 2017 federal court ruling in National Venture Capital v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 4:12 pm
We wrote a blog post about this a couple of years ago, but just to refresh your recollection: There is a significant question, especially after Inclusive Communities, about whether disparate impact claims are cognizable under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act in the first place (see “The ECOA Discrimination and Disparate Impact – Interpreting the Meaning of the Words that Actually Are There,” 61 Business Lawyer 829 (2006)); The Supreme Court decision in Dukes… [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 5:56 am
In Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Duke and State of New York v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:20 am
” The much-quoted line comes from West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:39 pm
Duke, et. al, overturning the government’s delay of the International Entrepreneur Rule. [read post]
