Search for: "Daniel v. Daniel" Results 521 - 540 of 7,793
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 3:23 pm by lpbncontracts
Here's how we described the case back then: Daniel Kirk, a Vietnam War veteran, worked at Millar Elevator Industries beginning in the... [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 12:10 am by Swaraj Paul Barooah
Daniel Morel[1] decided by the New York District Court in 2011. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 11:03 am by Thomas James
On Monday, the Court granted certiorari in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am by Daniel Sokol
W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:20 am
Author Kamyar Ali Licence CC BY 2.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsSouth Park, Oxford Jane LambertPatents Count (Daniel Alexander KC) Oxford University Innovation Ltd v Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd [2022] EWHC 3200 (Pat) (23 Dec 2022)This was an action by Oxford University Innovations Ltd, ("OUI") to recover the royalties due under a licence agreement that it had entered with Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:37 pm
Danielle Citron writes on Concurring Opinions: On Monday, a New Jersey Superior Court wrapped up a fifteen-week trial in Gusciora v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 2:01 am by CMS
In this post, Daniel Saul, an associate at CMS, comments on the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Ho v Adelekun [2021] UKSC 43, an important decision on the scope of Qualified One-Way Costs Shifting. [read post]
16 May 2007, 2:09 pm
Daniel Sokol Judge Schwab has dismissed the FTC injunction request for the Equitable Resources/Dominion Peoples merger. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:12 am by Will
We can’t say much about it because of our involvement in the Hormone Therapy litigation, but the Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued its decision in Daniel v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:47 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Mistrial without manifest necessity — Motion to dismiss indictments In this interlocutory appeal, Appellant Andrew Daniel Baker asserts that the Circuit Court for Cecil County abused its discretion by denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss the indictments after the court declared a mistrial without manifest necessity. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:30 am
Daniel Sokol Barry Rodger (University of Strathclyde Law School) has been doing some very interesting empirical work on private rights of action in the UK. [read post]