Search for: "Davis v. Bear"
Results 521 - 540
of 622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
” In context, this word generally (as in Articles I and II) means a state’s lawmaking system—as the Supreme Court has repeatedly held in a century-old line of cases from Ohio ex rel Davis v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
Kramer’s own words, as I included in my article: As we discussed, I became aware of the mass mailing piece bearing my firm’s name when I saw it on your website. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Such hearing shall only be held if:(i) the person is related to the child as described under paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of subdivision three of section four hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law;(ii) the child has been temporarily removed under this part, or placed pursuant to section one thousand fifty-five of this article, and placed in non-relative foster care;(iii) the relative indicates a willingness to become the foster parent for such child and has not refused previously to be… [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
” Carroll v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Teenie Weenie Wins Split Decision Over Paddington in TTAB 2(d) Battle-of-the-Bear-DesignsDivided TTAB Panel Disagrees over Doctrine of Equivalents, Reverses 2(d) Refusal of "ALLEZ FILLES! [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 3:52 am
And then there’s the recent matter of Trinity v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:33 am
Security National Guaranty v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
Its earlier quotation from Buckley v UK would seem to intimate so. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
Davis, — F.3d —, 2016 WL 3245043 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (Marks rule, Fair Sentencing Act) The en banc court needed to decide “how to interpret the Supreme Court’s fractured opinion in Freeman v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
” As noted above, the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Evans, to overturn Bowers v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
§ 4980H(a), which bears the appropriate title “Shared responsibility for employers. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 10:36 am
On Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Ø Title VII v. the First AmendmentAvila v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Jennifer Davis persuasively argues that changing economic and social conditions allowed the courts, in trade mark cases, to abandon a view of consumers as heterogeneous and divided by class, education and income and instead to assume the existence of an average consumer whose perceptions were key. [read post]
