Search for: "Deal, et al v. Grant, et al" Results 521 - 540 of 1,002
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Instead, this 40% magnitude of reduction results only in a loss of chance which is not compensable in medical malpractice cases (See: Cottrelle et al v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:07 pm by Lisa Peters
Marbley, United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, determined that Service Employees International Union, Local 1 et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:00 am by stevehansen
   Last week, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued its post-remand opinion in Association for Molecular Pathology, et al., v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am by Ben Cheng
§ 7, violates the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment; and (2) whether the court below erred by inventing and applying to Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act a previously unknown standard of equal protection review.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (1st Cir.)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of Capital Hill Prayer Foundation et al.Amicus brief of Indiana et al.Amicus brief of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am by Howard Knopf
    Case: 33921Entertainment Software Association, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:29 pm by WIMS
EPA; and various intervenors including the State of Michigan, et al. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
James Newport Beach, et al., to be filed.)The Court granted review in only one case today, a result which surprised the professional observers at SCOTUSblog, who pointed out that the Court has granted review in only 19 cases thus far -- not enough to fill its argument slots in October to December of this year. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm by admin
Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (First published in Competition Policy International, Antitrust Chronicle) “As a result of this alleged conspiracy, we believe that consumers paid millions of dollars more for some of the most popular titles. [read post]