Search for: "Dennis v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 1,025
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Little did either of us realize that he had guided me to a topic that would come to dominate my academic career and to which, after a book and numerous articles on Dennis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
 The IPKat learned yesterday that the United Kingdom's Minister for Intellectual Property, Baroness Neville-Rolfe, is to visit that sadly-troubled entity, the European Patent Office. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:54 am by Tara Hofbauer
Wells highlighted Lawfare’s almost-live coverage of yesterday’s motions hearing in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:47 am by Dennis Crouch
[T]he premise of defendants’ exhaustion defense is that all handsets in the United States are licensed and that the asserted claims contemplate a use of handsets by handset owners/possessors. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 623 (1984) ("Freedom of association ... plainly presupposes a freedom not to associate. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 8:42 pm by Dennis Crouch
Question Presented: Whether actions to cancel or revoke a patent must be tried in Article III Courts with access to a jury under the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:47 am by Clara Spera
As the United States still figures out how to approach the increasingly dire situation in Yemen – Shiite Houthi rebels essentially overthrew Yemen’s U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:00 pm by Staci Zaretsky
United States to show the common usage of the word “accompany. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:43 pm by Albert Wan
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently took up this issue in the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:28 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch On Patently-O, our primary focus is patent law, but sometimes we remember that the “Patent Office” is actually the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:35 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The United States (DOJ and PTO) argued that cert should be granted on this issue, agreeing with Commil that issues of validity are irrelevant to infringement. [read post]