Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
Direct Claims Distinguished from Derivative Claims A direct claim, meanwhile, involves a claim of harm done to the individual shareholder, member or limited partner. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 5:34 am
For over 15 years, plaintiff ESCO was the only supplier of EMAS for US airports, but Runway Safe entered the market in 2014. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 4:28 am
As for the former, he included pictures of the product he allegedly purchased in the complaint, identifying that product. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:51 pm
Aug. 9, 2013) (magistrate judge) Plaintiffs alleged they’d purchased a number of Nestlé products in reliance on false/misleading claims. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:43 am
Regarding secondary meaning, plaintiff did not offer any direct evidence, which comes from consumer testimony or consumer surveys. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The court describes that: [Roca’s] Purchase Agreement requires customers to agree that, unless they pay the full purchase price without conditions, they “WILL NOT speak, publish, print, blog or write negatively about The Product or The Company in any way. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:43 am
It was plausibly directed toward potential customers. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
(The plaintiffs argue that making such a payment does not relieve someone from the so-called legal "duty" imposed by the insurance-maintenance requirement. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:15 am
Where they purchased the aircraft or engine is not known. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 5:01 am
It did not concern an assets purchase and sale transaction, did not involve a contractual provision allowing a non-party to revise a non-competition clause, and did not reflect an appellate tribunal’s direction to a trial judge to rewrite the clause. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
The question was whether they could represent putative class members who suffered a similar injury based on purchases of products that plaintiffs didn’t purchase. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 4:46 am
The result in that case was that persons who purchased prescription drugs in states that did not even allow private enforcement of consumer fraud statutes were granted leave to seek mandatory treble damages under the New Jersey statute, even though their purchase had nothing whatever to do with New Jersey. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 12:43 pm
Thanks to CAFA, indirect purchaser cases filed in state courts under state law are being removed to federal court and coordinated in MDL litigation along with the direct purchaser action. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:57 pm
Plaintiffs also alleged that they purchased the software prior to accessing Amazon’s site, so by their own allegations, Amazon’s conduct did not necessitate the purchase of the software. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:04 am
Thus, the reprehensibility factors point in both directions. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:32 am
“Remarkably, even the named plaintiff could not recall whether he had purchased the diet supplement. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:20 am
Schiff sent the Hirschs in December of 2007, before the Trust had purchased the insurance policy. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:55 am
All other class members without proof of purchase would get $5. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:40 am
Instead, such plaintiffs have established reliance by invoking a Court-created presumption that a public, material misrepresentation will distort the price of stock traded in an efficient market, and that anyone who purchases the stock at the market price may be considered to have done so in reliance on the misrepresentation. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:35 am
Anytime you purchase property in Florida, an inspection by a licensed, certified home inspector is typically part of the process. [read post]
