Search for: "Divine v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
The court in Deutsch v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
Rex v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 12:00 pm
Or, as the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
They were solidly in the tradition of the ancient prophets, who would catalogue the sins of the people and invoke the Divine litany of curses upon people who have wandered from the righteous path prescribed in Scripture. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:27 am
(Lynch v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 5:41 am
” DeBoer v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
In fact, the conservative majority in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
See Dred Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:33 am
" Kline v [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
It assumes a secular world, in which there is such a thing as objective truth, which can be searched for and should be searched for without hindrance from authorities who claim their higher knowledge from divinities or ideologies or even the people. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 4:09 pm
However, it was not stated whether journalists will have the right to argue against the disclosure of phone records. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
By contrast a judge, even one very experienced in intellectual property matters, does not have some special power of divination which leads instantly to an infallible conclusion, and no judge would claim to have such a power [though Lord Dilhorne must have come pretty close to doing so in his speech in Hensher v Restwawile]. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
United States, 31 Fed. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
FCC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
