Search for: "Dodd v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Frank’s plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm
First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm
Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit: As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:33 am
Circuit to rehear the case in light of the outcome of an unrelated First Amendment lawsuit, American Meat Institute v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 5:54 pm
Wyndham Worldwide – What it Means for Hotel Owners by Bob Braun, Hotel Lawyer and Data Security Advisor Background on the case On August 24, 2015, the Third Circuit United States Court of Appeals issued its ruling in the case FTC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:08 am
” Malecki Law had reported on this Wall Street Journal article and examined the state of Dodd-Frank Whistleblower program, as it existed then, in this blog post. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 6:19 am
The Dodd-Frank Act (Act) Section 1502 addressed these “conflict minerals” —tantalum, tin, tungsten and gold—by directing the SEC, the Department of State (State), the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
The court adopted GE Energy’s argument that Dodd-Frank did not protect employees against retaliation in response to internal reporting, stating that “[u]nder Dodd-Frank’s plain language and structure, there is only one category of whistleblowers: individuals who provide information relating to a securities law violation to the SEC. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
The Fifth Circuit held in Asadi v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 7:35 am
The Fifth Circuit held in Asadi v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:25 am
In Khaled Asadi, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:03 am
Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm
[Bridget Johnson on anti-cinema, anti-stock-trading views of radical Islamist British activist and former lawyer Anjem Choudary] Rare coalition of bankers, housing advocates urges limits on mortgage-related suits [W$J] “The Administrative State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 7:43 am
Circuit, in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 3:17 pm
Circuit unanimously concluded today in State National Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:20 am
Mishkin The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing yesterday entitled “The Administrative State v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:28 pm
”[6] The SEC’s stated rationale for its decision to bring more of its cases as administrative proceedings is that it is simply making use of its new authority under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) to pursue monetary damages against non-regulated entities through administrative proceedings, rather than in federal court. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:10 am
According to FSOC, disclosure of documents provided by state insurance regulators is precluded by the confidentiality protections of Dodd-Frank Act coupled with state law privileges (MetLife, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:35 pm
Even longer version: the plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]
