Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
Writing in the New York Times, Einer Elhauge also argues that the Court should uphold the law, reasoning that the individual mandate “does not require Americans to subject themselves to health care. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
The Associated Press (via the Sacramento Bee), Michael Doyle of the Kansas City Star, and Adam Liptak of the New York Times all have coverage of the cases, as does Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 1:30 pm
The blanket order follows a number of inquiries to CSA members regarding the impact of NI 31-103 on the obligations of mortgage investment entities, to which many requirements of the national instrument are not applicable. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:20 pm
The underpinnings of the report A PATENT SYSTEM FOR THE 21ST CENTURY are rather interesting in being supported by a contract coming from NASA:[The study "AERONAUTICS INNOVATION: NASA'S CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES" was supported by Contract # NASW-99037, Task Order #103 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the SAME contract which supported "A Patent System for the 21st Century", but the NASA study on… [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:14 pm
Cone, 460 U.S. at 16, 103 S.Ct. 927. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
If an employee does his job particularly well, we think a reward system of some kind makes perfect sense. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 11:20 am
§ 103. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:14 pm
So first things was the Madam bit and we sorted that out and she said, as for Black Mercedes, I used to have a Black Mercedes, and then she explained to me that she no longer does. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:24 am
I was advised that Tennessee does collect DNA samples at the time of arrest in some cases. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 8:57 pm
In that instance the fact that a combination was obvious to try might show that it was obvious under SECTION 103. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 9:01 am
On January 10, the Federal Circuit issued an opinion affirming a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) invalidating several claims of U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 2:09 pm
Looking at new FRE 103(a), the First (with a dissent) finds that renewals of objections are generally not required. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:16 am
The matter ultimately ended up at the CJEU.The first question asked whether "…Article 118m(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation No 1234/2007 and Article 103(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation No 1308/2013… are to be interpreted as meaning that the scope of those provisions covers a situation where a PDO, such as ‘Champagne’, is used as part of the name under which a foodstuff is sold, such as ‘Champagner Sorbet’, and where that foodstuff does not correspond to… [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 8:25 pm
Although the procedure requires the director to provide a “written opinion” setting forth any reasoning, it does not appear to require director review or reasons for denial of review. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:04 am
Thankfully, the authors' law firm, Dechert, does not practice in Pennsylvania. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 9:18 am
Regarding the conflict of law nature of Article 28 of Directive 2009/103, which regulates the Member States’ obligation to provide measures guaranteeing that the victim of a road traffic accident and the owner of the vehicle involved in that accident are protected, the CJEU states that this is not the conflict-of-law provision and that, consequently, it does not take precedence over the Rome II Regulation under Article 27 of the latter. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:56 pm
The police, the prosecutors, and the courts have access to information about an individual’s driving record that the general public does not. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:18 pm
§ 40-35-103(5). [read post]
23 May 2010, 4:31 pm
(See 775 ILCS 5/103(A) and 775 ILCS 5/103(B).) [read post]
