Search for: "Doe Governmental Agencies 1-5"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
5. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 4:28 pm
The magnitude and scope of civil penalty exposure is outlined at 2014 FAQ 5. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Adler, Duke University (March 19) Governmental policies often have important distributional consequences. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 11:43 am
R Street does not discriminate on the basis of age, sex, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, era of military service, gender identity, relationship structure or anything else that's illegal, immoral or stupid to use as a basis for hiring. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:55 pm
P. 10(a); LCVR 5.1(c)(1) . [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Los Angeles, 861 F.2d 198 (9th Cir.1989), we articulated five factors to determine whether an agency is an arm of the state: (1) “whether a money judgment would be satisfied out of state funds,” (2) “whether the entity performs central governmental functions,” (3) “whether the entity may sue or be sued,” (4) “whether the entity has the power to take property i [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 5:08 am
Two related South Carolina federal district court cases have also held that testimony before a government agency, made in response to a request by that agency, does not qualify as "exercising a political right. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Constitution,[1]Arts. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
On 1 February 2012 notice of the application was given to the Government.5. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
So where does the decision go next? [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 2:24 pm
Our Supreme Court held that this denial of process violated the officer's constitutional rights under Article I, Section 1, reasoning the provision applies "when a governmental entity acts in an arbitrary and capricious manner toward one of its employees by failing to abide by promotional procedures that the employer itself put in place. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
Hargis Industries, Inc. 13-352Issue: (1) Whether the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s finding of a likelihood of confusion precludes respondent from relitigating that issue in infringement litigation, in which likelihood of confusion is an element; and (2) whether, if issue preclusion does not apply, the district court was obliged to defer to the Board’s finding of a likelihood of confusion absent strong evidence to rebut it. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Senators in the 19th century under the original Constitution—that do not involve fashioning general regulatory policy), “Legislature” does NOT mean any specific state governmental body, but instead the state’s lawmaking process, a process that can include within its umbrella the people of a state undertaking direct democracy. [read post]
6 May 2019, 3:17 pm
The IRS issued proposed regulations in mid-October 2018,[4] and a second round last week.[5] This second round benefits P3s as follows: Taking our city hall, school, courthouse, or convention center as an example, the tax-exempt government agency in the P3 typically owns the real estate and improvements – e., what would otherwise be a QOF’s direct-owned assets. [read post]
3 Apr 2010, 9:30 am
Massachusetts does. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
Hornbook law does not give property owners absolute rights to exclude. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
§§ 106(1), (4). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:42 pm
The First Amendment does not apply in this case because Disney is not a governmental agency. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:59 am
§ 659(i)(5). [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:48 pm
"That's a very clever label - it does not talk about anxiety or insomnia (disease states), but instead makes an artful structure-function claim. [read post]
