Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,710
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:47 pm
In a 2011 decision, Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Now the Senate will be considering another judge for elevation to the Supreme Court, a judge who may be even more inclined to want to overturn Roe v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Co. v Natl. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 2:11 pm
In a 2011 decision, Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
CFTC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:53 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Here, it does. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm
Sullivan, 325 U. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:39 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 11:55 am
Sullivan home. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 5:52 am
The Second Circuit (Pooler, Lohier and Sullivan [D.J.]) ruling does not tell us what plaintiff was charged with. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 3:55 am
Sullivan W. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:02 am
The issue was squarely raised last week in Facebook v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:42 am
It does not appear that Mr. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Escalate because this is a policy decision: if I am supposed to apply the policy as written then it’s easy and I delete the profile (assuming this too doesn’t require escalation; if it does I escalate for that purpose). [read post]
6 May 2018, 10:41 am
Press Printing Co. (1864) held, "The press does not possess any immunities, not shared by every individual. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:37 pm
Lane, 489 U.S. 288,, 109 S.Ct. 1060 (1989); Sullivan v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am
Specifically, this is to prevent “hybrid dividends” that receive a deduction in the foreign country when paid to the U.S. and when received in the United States, resulting in effectively no tax on that flow of income.[8] The participation exemption excludes ordinary foreign profits paid to parent corporations in the form of dividends, but it does not exclude capital gains. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
Boehm v Town of Sullivan’s Island Board of Zoning Appeals, 2018 WL 1513747 (SC App 3/28/2018) [read post]
