Search for: "Does, 1-13"
Results 521 - 540
of 21,735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 5:36 am
So, what does she hope for when people see the statue? [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Does conduct of a particular description, in a specific set of circumstances, on its own unique facts, constitutes having "engaged in" "insurrection or rebellion" within the meaning of the Constitution? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The addition of the policy statement is driven in part by the OCC’s determination that the Comptroller’s Licensing Manual does not adequately describe “all of the OCC’s considerations regarding the BMA statutory factors and its related processes such as considerations for holding public meetings. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
(12/13/21). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
" (And odd comments given that the Sinecure Clause does not use "chosen" at all. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:56 am
Feb. 13, 2023 OAKLAND, Calif. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
First of all, they are insufficient, particularly for those of us who approach The Collaborative Constitution wondering why it is that her work does not reserve a major role for "We the People" (this is to say, why it does no reserve a major role for the authors of the Constitution, and the “demos” referred to in the very idea of “democracy”). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:11 pm
On 1 February 2024, Mrs Justice Steyn handed down judgment in Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Limited [2024] EWHC 13 (KB) – denying the former US President’s amendment application and granting Orbis’s strike out / summary judgment application over the remainder of the claim. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Off-Ramp Argument No. 1: The Griffin’s Case Argument That Enforcement Requires Congressional Legislation “Congress, and only Congress,” writes the CRSCC (Brief at pp.13-14), “has authority to enforce Section 3,” and therefore “states cannot claim for themselves authority to seek the disqualification of presidential candidates absent congressional authorization. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:26 am
The CNIL, however, is more specific on this point in step 1 of its draft guide. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
., No. 3:13-cv-00057 (N.D. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Frequently Asked Questions About Chapter 13 Bankruptcy 1. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Does Employee Dishonesty Justify Termination of Employment? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
Does Employee Dishonesty Justify Termination of Employment? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Under that standard, the First Amendment does not preclude punishment for incitement if it is established that the speech in question was “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action” and was “likely to incite or produce such action. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
(We flagged these problems to the Court in paragraph 13 of our now-denied motion for leave to participate in oral arguments.) [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:50 am
This offer is sufficient to defeat the Article 13(b) defense. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
§ 1, cl. 1, likewise vests the executive Power in “the President of the United States of America. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Valuing partial takings 1. [read post]
