Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 521 - 540
of 4,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2016, 6:29 am
A weak mind does not accumulate force enough to hurt itself; stupidity often saves a man from going mad. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:38 am
It is true that while Article 1 of Schedule 1 refers to 'cross-objection', Article 3 of that Schedule does not refer to cross-objection as such but that in our opinion make no difference. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 9:02 am
What does this have to do with me? [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:18 pm
In our view, that by itself does not throw any light on the scope of section 41 of the Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 8:47 am
There are four essential parts to a fourm policy: 1. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
See supra, at 1–2. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:13 am
This refusal was confirmed by the BoA in case R0153/2021-1. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:23 am
To ensure that your feedback may be considered, please submit it no later than December 1, 2013. 1. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
But, credit where credit is due, it does tend to make things stand out. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 4:36 pm
It only took me 41 years, but here's my list. [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
Doe did not appeal the Decryption Order. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 1:33 pm
As a result, APCo recorded a pretax write-off of $41 million ($26 million net of tax) in the first quarter of 2011. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:40 pm
Result: Ball State won 41-24. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
DAPA does not involve country-specific relief. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
” That section does not prohibit children’s attorneys, where appointed, from filing or rebutting objections to a Support Magistrate’s order. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
” That section does not prohibit children’s attorneys, where appointed, from filing or rebutting objections to a Support Magistrate’s order. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 9:06 pm
The pending Aristocrat case is interesting for several reasons: (1) it involves the greatest fear of many practicing patent prosecutors — missing a deadline; (2) it will decide the scope of PTO authority in advance of Tafas v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 am
Hankins, [41 S.W. 1028, 1030 (Tenn. 1897)]; Chambers v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:37 pm
The new Rules became effective on Monday, October 5, 2009 and a notice published in the NJ Register on that date, 41 NJ Register 3807(a). [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:37 am
Whether the claim exceeds $100,000 or not, the best practice is to identify the request as a claim under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. 601-613, together with a request for a Contracting Officer’s Decision. [read post]
