Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 521 - 540 of 4,486
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2011, 2:07 am by Michael Geist
  For example, the Czech Republic's copyright law provides at Article 37 that: (1) Copyright is not infringed by a library, archive, museum, gallery, school, university and other non-profit school-related and educational establishment: a) if it makes a reproduction of a work for its own archiving and conservation purposes, and if such a reproduction does not serve any direct or indirect economic or commercial purpose; That country's anti-circumvention provisions… [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 8:27 am by Peter Thompson & Associates
From a Portland child injury lawyer standpoint, it’s important to point out that Maine does not recognize the so-called “seat belt defense. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 2:09 am by CMS
In other words, s.43 of VATA does not make the group into a taxable person, instead it treats the group’s supplies and liabilities as those of the representative member at the relevant time. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“The import of Dastar that an author's recourse for unauthorized use is in copyright cannot be avoided by shoe-horning a claim into section 43(a)(1)(B) rather than 43(a)(1)(A). [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  After PIC sued, OSI and Orgill executed a confirmatory copyright sublicense agreement, effective nunc pro tunc as of June 1, 2006. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:16 pm by Ronald F. Wick
Rule 23(c)(2)(B) requires “reasonable effort,” but when does ensuring individual notice become “unreasonable”? [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 7:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Here, under §43(a)(1)(A), “Plaintiff need only allege that the Dairy Farmers used in commerce any word (or words) which is likely to cause confusion as to the geographic origin of their milk products by another person. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 pm
This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:05 pm
This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:20 pm
This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 9:04 pm
This Briefing Note does not provide a comprehensive or complete statement of the law relating to the issues discussed nor does it constitute legal advice. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:08 am
Tivoli first used the TIVOTAPE mark on May 30, 2010, and TIVOBAR on September 21, 2015.Before the TTAB, a plaintiff must plead and prove the following to establish a claim for dilution by blurring under Section 43(c):1. [read post]
17 May 2021, 4:03 am
  Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment:  Not very often does the Board decide a dilution claim. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 pm
Conversely, where, as here, the claim language does not recite the term “means,” we presume that the limitation does not invoke § 112, ¶ 6. [...] [read post]
The heavy plurality answer, at 43 percent of respondents, is “3”—an answer that reflects either comfort with the status quo or a lack of strong opinion about it. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 4:07 pm
Doe this mean that a separated spouse will never have a FLA claim to an interest in a discretionary trust? [read post]