Search for: "Does 1-59"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,009
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2020, 2:49 pm
The EO will take effect at 11:59 p.m. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
Instead of being included in PIPEDA by s. 4(1)(a), I would suggest that most search engines are excluded due to the operation of s. 4(2)(c) of PIPEDA: Limit (2) This Part does not apply to ... [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:13 am
The state or city is often aware that a road or intersection is unusually dangerous and does nothing about it. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 8:15 am
., 59 F.3d 580, 582 (6th Cir. 1995), a case claiming that the NFL’s “blackout rule” discriminated against the deaf in violation of the ADA because it meant that for many games the only broadcast available was a radio broadcast. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am
T-256/04, par. 58-59]. [read post]
1 May 2014, 7:35 am
The Indian SC is an explicitly political institution which does not pretend to be otherwise. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:47 am
But it does prevent the cases from being listed in a casual web search. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
What kind of jurisdiction does Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, as implemented into the laws of Member States, confer upon national courts? [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 1:21 am
") does not seem to relate directly to injunctions. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
In support of its request for referral the appellant argued that the holding of oral proceedings in the form of a videoconference was not compatible with Articles 116 and 113(1) EPC.The appellant raised the general point of law of whether conducting oral proceedings in the form of a videoconference was compatible with Article 116(1) EPC. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:16 am
Instead, the chamber concludes the admissibility analysis after consideration of Article 17(1)(a) and (b), stating, “Inaction by the State having jurisdiction means that the question of unwillingness or inability does not arise, and a case would be admissible before the Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:14 pm
In yesterday's judgments in Cases T-59/14 ‘INVESTING FOR A NEW WORLD’ and T-609/13 ‘SO WHAT DO I DO WITH MY MONEY’ the General Court of the European Union reviewed the EU case-law on slogan marks, rejecting the appeal of the US-based corporation Blackrock Inc., on the basis that its Community trade mark (CTM) applications were devoid of distinctive character according to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 207/2009. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
What standard does the phrase “similarly situated” impose on the plaintiff: (1) “same or similar,” (2) “nearly identical,” or (3) some other standard? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 11:34 am
" It does not give "full weight" in its metrics to jobs that were funded by the law school. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:03 am
The court held that one does not have to provide documentary or physical evidence of sexual abuse when there is testimony that is corroborated by multiple witnesses. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:20 pm
Unsurprisingly, 96 percent of landlords are represented by a lawyer in eviction cases in the city while the same is true for just 1 percent of renters. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:55 am
First, for those individuals whose applications were denied, the record does not demonstrate whether there is any likelihood that they will have further interactions with Wells Fargo. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:28 pm
The specific questions that USDA requests comments on include: 1. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:29 am
Comments are due by Friday, October 18, 2019 at 11:59 PM ET. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 6:11 am
SIC accounts for 169 of the year’s new issues and is close to tripling its 2019 IPO output of 59 deals. [read post]
