Search for: "Dole v. Dole" Results 521 - 540 of 698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2011, 1:01 am by Marie Louise
: Biotechnology patent applicants (Patently-O) US: Bayh Dole Act a failure? [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Inditex is also an extended protection case, but in my view it’s much more of a classic case of the EU trade mark system doling out almost coin-toss decisions as a case scales the appeal chain. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Rabidoux, 2018 ONCA 686. https://t.co/AW2uOTxy7k 2018-08-30 Waiver of privilege in cyberbreach Kaplan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:43 am by Lyle Denniston
”   And he quickly brought up a prior precedent (South Dakota v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
Their IIED and negligent hiring, supervision, training, and retention claims failed, however (Arredondo v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:05 am by lawmrh
Allow for an impartial decision-maker to address unaccepted objections, see Chicago Teachers Union v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:17 am by Kelly
General Coming soon: International Classification of traditional medicine by WHO (Spicy IP) Teva Pharma uses online game to promote generic substitution (Patent Baristas) Australia: APO: Success of phase 3 trials ‘obvious’ in view of phase 1 and 2: Genentec, Inc (Patentology) Brazil: Government support to impel Brazil generic market (GenericsWeb) EU: EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal decides Broccoli (G2/07) and Tomatoes (G1/08) – essentially biological breeding processes not patentable… [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:31 pm
(To give only one example, in 2000, in U.S. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:34 am by The Charge
  But, in a recent case mimicking a morality play, ability to pay stands front and center in a starring role.In Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:58 am by Alexander Vindman
Unlike with Trump in the impeachment trial, the First Amendment clearly does apply here, and it has a very high standard for incitement under Brandenburg v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm by Kiera Flynn
Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987), no longer applies; (2) whether Congress may treat states no differently from any other employer when imposing invasive mandates as to the manner in which they provide their own employees with insurance coverage, as suggested by Garcia v. [read post]