Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 2:43 pm
This case concerns an appeal [2010] EWCA Civ. 33 from the August 2008 judgment in Eli Lilly & Co. v Human Genome Sciences Inc., [2008] EWHC 1903 (Pat), wherein Mr. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:59 am
Wainwright, that found the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments mandated states appoint counsel for indigent criminal defendants, Make No Law, concerning the New York Times v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
The same patent was previously held invalid by the UK Courts for lack of novelty as a result an invalid priority right in Novartis v Hospira (see [2013 EWCA 516 (Pat.) and [2013] EWCA Civ 1663). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
They are a minute body professing a pure Fascist ideology who have long sought a suitable fuehrer“ There were twenty four members of “Mlado Russ” in England and the plaintiff was the head of the British branch. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 9:08 pm
The House of Lords has just released a judgment, Em (Lebanon) (Fc) (Fc) v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:22 am
Way back in 1990, the Supreme Court decided Taylor v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:27 am
Here’s a breathtakingly broad decision: The Indiana Supreme Court, in Barnes v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:27 pm
On 17 September 2019, The Sun published a story about the England cricketer Ben Stokes and his family. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
In England the position is clear: Google is not a publisher. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
In House v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:00 am
In A v B, [2017] EWHC 3417 (Comm), the High Court of Justice of England and Wales has recently held that an arbitrator in an arbitration commenced by a single request to arbitrate did not have jurisdiction to decide disputes under multiple arbitration agreements. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 4:23 pm
One of the more illogical and unfair legal rules involving medical malpractice lawsuits stems from a mid-century United States Supreme court case Feres v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 9:22 am
Murphy v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 1:09 am
The Fire Safety (England) Regulations 2022 apply in England only and will be brought into operation on 23 January 2023. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 12:01 am
But if in fact the instructions issued in Georgia v. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
Now, as I understand it, the case of Baze v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
In Chisholm v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:36 am
The appellant challenged the Valuation Tribunal for England’s decision that the respondents would be allowed to merge their two premises, which were recognised as separate hereditaments, to form a single hereditaments. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:21 am
Such was the case in England v. [read post]
