Search for: "EVANS v. STATE"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,612
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm
Dagenhart, United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 2:18 am
While Qualcomm's lead counsel in that case, Evan "Fire! [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm
Assisted in coordinating the Produce Safety Rule oriented On-Farm Readiness Review (OFRR) training programs under the leadership of the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA), the FDA, and produce oriented professionals from several State Cooperative Extension Services2. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 1:48 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Terry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:49 am
For example in Walker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Merrill is the Charles Evans Hughes Professor at Columbia Law School. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
The justices held 5-4 in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
Evan Lee has this blog’s opinion analysis. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:38 am
A. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:42 am
Justice Kavanaugh with opinion in Flowers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
To the extent that third-party plaintiffs’ submission of extrinsic evidence purporting to support a direct claim of legal malpractice could have been construed by the court as a request for leave to amend their third-party complaint, such a request was properly denied because third-party plaintiffs’ new claim is patently lacking in merit (see Broyles v Town of Evans, 147 AD3d 1496, 1497 [4th Dept 2017]). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:27 pm
Evans, 366 P.3d 906, 914 n.10, 919, 926, (Wash. 2015); State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:38 am
Patty v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm
Despite the controversy around these practices, it has never been discussed at the Supreme Court of Canada, until their recent decision in R. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Near v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 3:15 am
SEL relied on the High Court judgment in Griggs v Evans and argued that such an assignment should be implied, relying on the reasoning of Mr Prescott QC in that case:“Because the designer is not an employee of the company the legal title to the copyright belongs to him, because the Copyright Act says so; but the equitable title belongs to the company. [read post]
28 May 2019, 9:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
In Smith v. [read post]
