Search for: "Edward P. May"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,038
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 1:47 pm
Robin Jacob (Faculty of Laws, University College London, London) added to this by observing that the General Court has been far too lax with regard to submission of late evidence, while the CJEU has failed to control its own dockets, ending up less like a Supreme Court and more (per David Edward) like a very overworked Court of Appeal.Peter Ruess (International School of Management, Frankfurt) chipped in at this point, observing that CTM appeals involve a colossal degree a delay in… [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
P. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am
The list may, thus, say more about the intellectual interests of librarians than about the needs or attitudes of the plaintiff class. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:24 pm
Senator Daniel P. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 9:49 pm
Lots of mez, P&A funds from hedges/family offices. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 11:11 am
Pittmann Respondents, John Thomas Financial and Barry P. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:13 am
A split the baby ruling.It's Colorado and the case of Edward Montour who, you may recall, is facing trial for the murder of Eric Autobee. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
The critics of democracy may keep democracy on its toes. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:55 am
Em última análise, será o fim da liberdade no sentido mais amplo”. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:19 am
Sentencing is currently scheduled for May 19, 2014. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 4:05 am
Edwards, When Fear Rules in Law's Place: Pseudonymous Litigation As a Response To Systematic Intimidation, 20 Virginia Journal of Social Policy & Law 437-472 (2013).William M. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:15 am
Roberts, Martin P. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:38 am
Erica P. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Yet, as Chancellor Strine suggests (slip op. at Page 8-10 below) the answer to these difficult questions may be avoided entirely if the legislative will is understood merely as a default position from which the parties may contract around to suit their interests (subject of course to their relative bargaining power). [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm
Edward X. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:56 am
Its incidental use was therefore transformative.OK, you may ask (and Bouchat did), but how does this differ from the infringing highlight reels from Bouchat IV? [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Cheshire West and Chester Council, and P & Anor (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Surrey County Council, heard 21 – 23 October 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Cheshire West and Chester Council, and P & Anor (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Surrey County Council, heard 21 – 23 October 2013. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 am
P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Cheshire West and Chester Council, and P & Anor (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Surrey County Council, heard 21 – 23 October 2013. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:39 am
P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) v Cheshire West and Chester Council, and P & Anor (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Surrey County Council, heard 21 – 23 October 2013. [read post]
