Search for: "Elliott v. Elliott"
Results 521 - 540
of 759
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm
The Court also ruled that OCGA §36-92-3 insulated Elliott from suit. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:25 pm
2011AP167 Elliott v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
This was the case in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
McEntyre, Frederico v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
McEntyre, Frederico v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:42 am
In Moon v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 10:11 am
He later achieved national fame for representing Homer Plessy in Plessy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 3:30 pm
This investigation previously led to the October 2008 indictments of Testwell Laboratories and its top executives, V. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:37 pm
The EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:34 am
Sept. 9, 2011 Ford Elliott, Bender, Strassburger, J.) [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:18 am
We note a couple of interesting pieces by “Guardian” reader’s editor Chris Elliott. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:04 am
See Artiglio v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 9:00 am
(Elliott Associates v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
As to a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker, the Court of Appeals, in its March 22, 2001 decision in Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, [decided with Elliott v City of New York], said that: 1.The courts may not modify such a determination if substantial evidence supports it; and 2.A court must uphold an administrative penalty unless it finds that it is so disproportionate to the… [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 7:31 am
A group of professors of American and German securities law submitted an amicus brief to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Elliott Associates v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm
(WCxKit) Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
In Bray v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
”Douglas Elliott, a partner at Roy Elliott O’Connor LLP who represented Heydary Hamilton on the appeal, told the newspaper the court could have used the case to set clear guidelines for firms that poach clients on contingency fee retainers. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
The $25,000 fine issued by the court in that case, known as R. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:25 am
The controlled substances involved included the Schedule II drug OxyContin, the Schedule III drug Vicodin, the Schedule IV drug Xanax, and the Schedule V drug cough syrup with codeine. [read post]
