Search for: "England v. Cir*"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,594
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am
Property Tax Trends in Connecticut Property taxes—on both residential and commercial real property as well as vehicles, machinery, and equipment—are the only local tax of consequence in Connecticut, responsible for 98.5 percent of local tax collections and over half of all local revenues, including transfers from state government.[1] While property taxes are the predominant source of local tax revenue nationwide, this overwhelming reliance is unique to New England,[2] where… [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Supreme Court in Varjabedian v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
The act followed the Final Report of the Legal Services Task Team of August 2018 which recommended, amongst other things, the creation of limited licenses for the practice of law to be granted by the Law Society with appropriate requirements and practice conditions based on the circumstances of the licensee. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 12:04 am
About the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 12:04 am
About the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:21 am
The recent case of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13 clarified the English law position that a principal cannot be vicariously liable for the acts of an independent contractor. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 4:41 pm
In his dissent in Bostock v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
In reaching this conclusion, the Ninth Circuit primarily applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 2:13 am
What determines the injunction’s applicability is the nature of the services: when the sole purpose of the domain name and/or URL is to provide access to The Pirate Bay, Nyafilmer, Fmovies or Dreamfilm, then such services should fall under the scope thereof.Responsibility for providing list of targeting serversSimilar to the approach adopted by High Court of England and Wales (Arnold J) in FAPL v BT [2017] EWHC 480 Ch and [2018] EWHC 1828 (Ch) [commented on The IPKat here],… [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 1:06 am
Under the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (the “Insolvency Rules”), a mandatory set-off takes effect upon a company’s entry into liquidation. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
., Noble v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 6:35 am
This appeal will consider, inter alia, whether the courts of England and Wales have the power to stay an application for maintenance pursuant to the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 27 on the grounds of forum non conveniens when divorce proceedings are taking place in Scotland. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:03 pm
Wickliffe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am
This appeal considers, inter alia, whether orders by the High Court of England and Wales in family proceedings can be registered in Antigua and Barbuda under the Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgments Act. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:05 am
(A.) v Ryan, [1997] 1 SCR 157. 9. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 12:01 am
We start with an important legal case Trecarrel v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 12:01 am
We start with an important legal case Trecarrel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
In Trecarrell House Ltd v Rouncefield the Court of Appeal has held (by 2 to 1) that a landlord who has failed to provide his tenant with a gas safety certificate before the tenant enters into occupation is not prevented from using s.21, Housing Act 1988 to recover possession so long as he remedies that omission before service of the notice. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:00 am
In Trecarrell House Ltd v Rouncefield the Court of Appeal has held (by 2 to 1) that a landlord who has failed to provide his tenant with a gas safety certificate before the tenant enters into occupation is not prevented from using s.21, Housing Act 1988 to recover possession so long as he remedies that omission before service of the notice. [read post]
