Search for: "FDIC-Receiver" Results 521 - 540 of 1,202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 5:45 am
Just make sure the balances do not exceed the current maximums for FDIC (government backed) insurance on bank accounts. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:37 am by David Lynn
Sign up today to receive it by simply inputting your email address! [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:45 am by Dessen, Moses & Rossitto
Just make sure the balances do not exceed the current maximums for FDIC (government backed) insurance on bank accounts. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:45 am by Dessen, Moses & Rossitto
Just make sure the balances do not exceed the current maximums for FDIC (government backed) insurance on bank accounts. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 12:45 am by Dessen, Moses & Rossitto
Just make sure the balances do not exceed the current maximums for FDIC (government backed) insurance on bank accounts. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 12:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The FDIC Ramps Up the Lawsuits: Earlier last week, I noted that the FDIC had filed the first of failed bank D&O lawsuit in 2013. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, at least as of today, the FDIC itself has not filed an action in its capacity as receiver for the failed bank against this bank’s former directors and officers. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:06 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint, which the FDIC filed in its capacity as receiver for the failed bank, alleges claims for negligence, gross negligence and breach of fiduciary duty, can be found here. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 8:06 am by Adam Levitin
Any thoughts from readers on why are the small banks so unwilling to break with the big banks many issues where they receive more favorable treatment? [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
Although this problem can arise in many claims contexts, one particular context in which the problem can arise is in the context of claims by the FDIC as receiver of a failed bank against the bank’s former directors and officers. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:28 am by Kevin LaCroix
Nine out of the 25 D&O suits the FDIC filed in 2012, or about 36%, involved Georgia banks. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 1:25 pm by Craig Hoffman
 The winter 2012 issue of the FDIC’s Supervisory Insights featured a discussion that “describes the mobile payments marketplace and examines critical issues, including the adequacy of legal protections and disclosures received by consumers. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:13 pm by James Hamilton
  Unlike other independent financial regulators, including the SEC and the FDIC, the CFPB is run by a single director instead of a bipartisan or nonpartisan commission. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 6:25 am by BuckleySandler
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held that the FDIC, as receiver for a failed bank, is not entitled to memoranda prepared by a law firm in connection with the firm’s representation of two directors of the failed bank. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 12:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
The FDIC filed its lawsuit in its capacity as receiver of the failed Century Bank of Sarasota, Florida. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
One of the more interesting story lines in the securities class action litigation arena in recent years has been the emergence of substantial class action opt-out litigation, whereby various claimants representing significant shareholder ownership interests select out of the class suit and separately pursue their own claims – and settlements. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 12:32 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The case involves the former County Bank of Merced, California, which failed on February 6, 2009, when the FDIC was appointed as its receiver. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 9:14 am by Karen K. Harris
Since prepaid cards are not subject to Regulation E, consumers of prepaid cards often find themselves paying fees without receiving clear notices or explanations. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 12:47 am by Kevin LaCroix
In its role as receiver, the FDIC stands in the shoes of the failed bank, and is subject to all of the defenses that could have been asserted against the bank. [read post]