Search for: "FRANK HARRIS" Results 521 - 540 of 1,458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Posted by Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, July 29, 2017 Editor's Note: This post is based on a Fried Frank publication by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, Warren S. de Wied, Robert C. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 6:19 am
Klemash, EY, on Sunday, July 9, 2017 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, Climate change, Diversity, Engagement, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, Proxy access, Proxy season, Proxy voting, Shareholder proposals, Stewardship, Sustainability Second Circuit Rejects Shaw‘s “Extreme Departure Test” Posted by Robert Loeb and Robert Stern, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:09 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, & Philip Richter, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Monday, July 10, 2017 Editor's Note: Gail Weinstein is senior counsel and Philip Richter is a partner at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 9:40 am by Steve Lubet
The most glaring absence from the list, however, is Warren Burger, whose influence is still being felt in a way that, say, Sinclair Lewis's is not (and let's not forget Harry Blackmun and perhaps William O. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:01 am
Frye, University of Central Florida, on Monday, June 26, 2017 Tags: Agency costs, Board independence, Board monitoring, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Director compensation, Entrenchment, Executive Compensation, Executive turnover, Firm performance, Oversight, Pay for performance Below-the-Merger-Price Appraisal Results and the SWS Decision Posted by Gail Weinstein, & Philip Richter, Fried, Frank,… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Walter Olson at the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ruthann Robson at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, Another new case for next term involves the whistleblower provisions of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial law. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:16 am
Posted by Gail Weinstein, & Philip Richter, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Monday, June 26, 2017 Editor's Note: Gail Weinstein is senior counsel and Philip Richter is a partner at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:52 pm by Lovechilde
Kamala Harris (D-Bad Ass) tried to pin him down on the existence of this policy, he claimed he was too nervous to answer the question and had to be bailed out by John McCain (R-Old White Man), who scolded Harris for being too tough on his friend.Sessions also relied on an indefensible interpretation of executive privilege. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 6:27 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Give it a watch, they did a great job with it: Kudos to Inger Chandler from the Harris DA Conviction Integrity Unit and James Miller of the Houston Forensic Science Center (the bowtie was a nice touch) for their frank assessments of the problems with these commonly used instruments of junk science, which have caused an eye-popping number of false convictions. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:06 am
Brownback, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Wednesday, June 7, 2017 Tags: Bank Holding Company Act, Banks, Broker-dealers, Dodd-Frank Act, Donald Trump, FDIA, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Glass-Steagall, GLBA, Investment banking, Mortgage lending, US Senate Supreme Court Applies Five-Year Statute of Limitations to SEC Disgorgement Claims Posted by Lewis J. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
Roe, Harvard Law School, on Friday, May 26, 2017 Tags: Bankruptcy, CHOICE Act, Dodd-Frank Act, FDIC, Financial crisis, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Liquidation, Restructurings, SIFIs, Systemic risk Potential Regulatory Relief—Financial CHOICE Act 2.0 Posted by John Ellerman, Pay Governance LLC, on Saturday, May 27, 2017 Tags: CHOICE Act, Clawbacks, Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Incentives,… [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Schwenkel, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP The plaintiff contended that, over the two-year period prior to the exercise date of Oak Hill’s redemption right, rather than managing the Company to maximize its long-term value for the benefit of the common stockholders, the directors had operated the Company so that it would be in a position to redeem the maximum amount of Preferred Stock as quickly as possible after the redemption right was exercised. [read post]