Search for: "FRENCH v. STATE" Results 521 - 540 of 3,098
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2016, 3:35 pm by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
Neary-French as to whether the defendant had a right to an attorney prior to submitting to a breathalyzer test. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 3:35 pm by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
Neary-French as to whether the defendant had a right to an attorney prior to submitting to a breathalyzer test. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:30 pm
Amy Howe discusses today’s opinion in No. 07-1059, United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:41 pm by Catherine Jasserand
This article applies in addition to the general rule (Article 2 of Regulation 44/2001), which states that in principle a person is sued in the Courts of the Member State where he is domiciled. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Sargent, 2016 ABCA 104 [17] This Court has previously stated that smuggling drugs into a penal institution should be treated as an aggravating factor: R v Gargas, 2013 ABCA 245 (CanLII) at para 7. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:46 am
The Court of Appeal has in Youell v La Reunion [2009] EWCA Civ 175 confirmed that, in light of the important West Tankers decision of the European Court of Justice, (see here) the arbitration exclusion to the Brussels I Regulation will be narrowly applied by the English courts. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:50 am by sally
Supreme Court Global Process Systems Inc & Anor v Berhad [2011] UKSC 5 (1 February 2011) ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Steed v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 75 (01 February 2011) Barclay & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 32 (01 February 2011) Hereworth v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 74 (01 February 2011) Welsh v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 73 (01 February 2011)… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Halleck (cable public access channel not a state actor); Criminal forfeiture, where used, should track lines of individual owner and asset responsibility, not the loose all-for-one joint-and-several-liability standards of some civil litigation [Trevor Burrus on Cato certiorari petition in Peithman v. [read post]