Search for: "Failing v. Failing" Results 521 - 540 of 98,521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 7:33 am
”The May 14 decision, American Dental Association v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 8:15 am
Finally today, we have a small dose of copyright fail, though I am not sure where to place the fail just yet. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:34 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals rejects the habeas petition, and that's probably the end of the line for this guy.The case is Chrysler v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 10:11 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Uber Retailer’s TOS Fails, But New Jersey Warranty Notice Claim Loses Anyway Court Upholds Airbnb’s Terms of Service–Selden v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 7:52 am
"Blog Takes Failed Marriage Into Fight Over Free Speech": Today's edition of The New York Times contains an article that begins, "Normally, Garrido v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:34 pm by Elie Mystal
Here’s the set up, from the First Department opinion in Keefe v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Although the stipulation failed to identify the party who would be responsible for submitting the QDRO, “it is generally the responsibility of the party seeking approval of the QDRO to submit it to the court with notice of settlement” (Kraus v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The issue raised on appeal is whether Supreme Court properly struck respondent's unverified answer (see Matter of Atwood v Pridgen, 142 AD3d 1278, 1279 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 945 [2016]).Petitioners failed to reject respondent's answer and deem it a nullity based upon the lack of a verification (see CPLR 3022). [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:39 am
Prisoner failing to return is not an escaper Regina v Montgomery Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a prisoner who was on temporary release from prison failed to return to prison at the expiry of his release period, he could not be said to have escaped from custody and could not therefore be guilty of the common-law offence of escape from custody. [read post]