Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 1,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2011, 7:29 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, issued an opinion on October 13, 2011, that is insightful for understanding at least one way of beating the appraisal clause. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:41 pm by Jon Gelman
  Haro v Sebelius, ___F.3d____, No. 11-16606, 2013 WL 4734032, Decided Sept.4, 2013.Read prior posting about this case: Federal Court Enjoins CMS From MSP Recovery Procedures May 18, 2011 Haro v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 3:36 pm by Misty Edmundson
Employers Insurance Co. of Wausau, Oregon Federal District Court Cause No. 3:11-cv-01493, Opinion and Order on Summary Judgment (February 4, 2013) (Dkt. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:22 pm by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
More Blog Posts: Federal Court Awards Additional Damages to Plaintiff Based On Insurance Company’s Bad Faith, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog, published September 9, 2016. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 6:23 am by McKennon Law Group
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:50 pm by McKennon Law Group
The de novo standard of review is the “default” national standard, and it has been since 1989, when the United States Supreme Court held (in Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Among the first courts to address Levine in the context of a generic manufacturer was the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Stacel v. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 7:47 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Rise of Health Care’s Middlemen The United States leads the world in payments to private insurance providers. [read post]