Search for: "Federal v. Levine"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2010, 12:27 pm
Mensing was the first federal appellate case to address generic preemption in the wake of Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
In Bartlett v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:02 am
Levine. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:30 pm
Indeed, in PLIVA Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:43 pm
Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In the first, Vance v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 1:15 pm
Levine (2009)), which it urged did not adequately define the “clear evidence” standard, allowing lower courts to hold defendants subject to inconsistent and unreasonable verdicts. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:52 am
Perry v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 2:38 am
Levine & Assoc., P.C., 122 AD3d 686, 687 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
But it did not rule on those issues because it concluded that the arbitration violated the relevant federal statute. ------- Title: Hemi Group, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:20 am
The Williams v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:50 pm
(credit: Richard Levine/Corbis via Getty Images) A federal appeals court has now partially ruled in favor of the SCO Group, breathing new life into a lawsuit and a company (now bankrupt and nearly dead) that has been suing IBM for nearly 15 years. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Arters is a generic drug case – it’s governed by Mensing, not Levine. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Levine, 788 F.2d 830 (2d Cir. 1986); Brockmeyer v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:17 pm
Levine, which asks whether a state law tort action challenging the labeling on a Wyeth drug is pre-empted by federal law. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:35 am
Although ...the first case AAJ cites is that of Diana Levine of Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
In a previous 2000 case, Geier v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:49 am
Federal Communications Commission and Cable Telecommunications and Technology v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Where a federal requirement permits a course of conduct and the state makes it obligatory, the state’s requirement is in addition to the federal requirement and thus is preempted.McMullen v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
Well, as it turns out, a securities suit filed last week in the federal court in Manhattan may just answer that question. [read post]
