Search for: "Fictitious Defendant #1" Results 521 - 540 of 609
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm by lawmrh
In the preceding entirely fictitious scenarios, every instance implicates an attorney-client relationship and consequently, a confidential communication.[1] And whether you’re retained or paid isn’t relevant. [read post]
25 May 2010, 4:33 pm by Eugene Volokh
This rule precludes any appeal when a defendant has fled the jurisdiction after conviction but before sentencing. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
Below, we discuss the most significant aspects of Elena Kagan’s experience and writings as they relate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, 58 AD3d 1, 9-10 [2008]; Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc., 10 AD3d 267, 271 [2004]. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:51 am
The exception was bankruptcy: Forty-two firms with assets of $1 billion or more filed for Chapter 11 protection in 2009. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 8:31 am by velvel
No. 95-763, at 1 (1978), reprinted in 1978 U.S.C.C.A.N. 764, 764. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm by Monroe Freedman
Defendants' own press release described its proposed rules as protecting consumers against 'potentially misleading ads,'" the panel wrote in Alexander v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:29 am by Veronika Gaertner
The reason for the measure was the defendant’s violation of a freezing and disclosure order. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:40 pm by jefhenninger
  The jury will really hate the defendant as he will be seen as Madoff’s right hand man. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 5:50 am
Not defending the innocent or prosecuting the guilty. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:30 am by Susan Brenner
Bvocik was charged with, and ultimately convicted of, violating Wisconsin Statutes § 948.075(1), which provides as follows: Whoever uses a computerized communication system to communicate with an individual who the actor believes or has reason to believe has not attained the age of 16 years with intent to have sexual contact or sexual intercourse with the individual in violation [Wisconsin Statutes] § 948.02(1) or (2) is guilty of a Class C felony. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
Defendant argues that a fictitious name or a John Doe name is insufficient to identify anyone, and therefore is insufficient to identify anyone with particularity. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm by Bruce Nye
  Under Code of Civil Procedure section 474, she may nonetheless sue the defendant under a "fictitious name. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 12:19 pm by Keith L. Miller
He also apparently used about $3.6 million finance his lifestyle, including a $1 million home in Fairview. [read post]