Search for: "Fitzgerald v State" Results 521 - 540 of 580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
For publication opinions today (4): In Grover Fitzgerald v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Appraisal - Commercial 2 Mike Akerly Indigo Sky Properties Development 3 meir the babaev group developer 2 shanell rhodes Investor Investor / Owner 1 Giampolo Rivera Cantor Fitzgerald Investor / Owner 2 Paul Menendez, Jr. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 2:34 pm
Hardee's Food Systems, Inc., 143 F.3d 800 (3d Cir. 1998)) and a suspension from horse racing for suspected cheating (Fitzgerald v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:48 pm
To access the certiorari stage filings in the two granted cases — Fitzgerald, et vir v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:21 pm
  The new case is Fitzgerald, et al., v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:41 pm
The conference also features a petition — Fitzgerald v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
21 May 2008, 7:45 am
Bell Issue: Whether a federal habeas claim is "procedurally defaulted" because it has been presented twice to the state courts, and whether a federal habeas court is powerless to recognize that a state court erred in holding that state law precludes reviewing a claim. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:04 pm by Litwak
The state argues that the "grossly repugnant" video games are not worthy of First Amendment protection because they do not communicate or express ideas or information.For more information, please see: Entertainment Software Association et al. v. [read post]